Atlanta Business Attorney Blog

Most small business owners form what are called “pass-through” entities. Two examples of a “pass-through” entity are S-corporations and Limited Liability Companies. A pass-through entity means that, for tax purposes, the income of the business passes through to the business owners, and the business owners are taxed themselves. Large corporations such as Coca-Cola are generally C-corporations and the corporations are taxed on the profits that are generated, and then taxed again on the money that is passed onto the shareholders.

As a general rule, forming a Georgia corporation or LLC does not provide liability protection to its business owners for tax liabilities. This rule was made clear in the case of Littriello v. United States, 484 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 2007). In this case, the Plaintiff, Frank Littriello, challenged the validity of the Treasury Department’s “check-the-box” regulations, 26 C.F.R. §§ 301.7701-1 to 301.7701-3. Littriello had incorporated several separate LLC’s, and he was the sole owner of each LLC. The operations of the LLC resulted in unpaid federal employment taxes totaling $1,077,000. Of course, the Internal Revenue Service brought actions against Littriello personally for these unpaid taxes. One of Littriello’s arguments to the Court was that the IRS had disregarded the separate existence of an LLC under state law. In their seven page opinion, the Court discussed the history of the “check-the-box” regulations and the difference between pass-through taxation and corporate taxation. After an extensive analysis, the Court found that the IRS may seek unpaid employment taxes from the sole owner of an LLC.

Despite the existence of LLCS for almost two decades, many Atlanta business owners still have questions about the extent of protection an LLC provides to its owners in contract disputes. Fortunately, Georgia appellate courts are upholding the corporate veil of the LLC. In the case of Milk v. Total Pay and HR Solutions, Inc., 634 S.E.2d 208 (Ga. App. 2006), Joseph Milk formed Burrito Joe’s Holding, LLC (“Burrito Joe’s”) to open a fast food Mexican restaurant in Canton, Georgia. Milk was the sole managing member and Jay McGhee and Frank Struck were to manage the restaurant without compensation with the goal of eventually becoming LLC members if the restaurant was successful. The managers entered into a client-service agreement on behalf of Burrito Joe’s with Total Pay and HR Solutions, Inc. (“Total Pay”). However, the restaurant never operated at a profit and was closed due to mounting financial difficulties. Total Pay brought suit in the trial court against Burrito Joe’s and Milk for damages. Fortunately for Milk, the Court of Appeals noted that LLCs have a legal existence separate from their owners just like any other corporation. As Milk’s signature did not appear on the agreement with Total Pay and no evidence was introduced on the record that Milk ever executed a note personally guaranteeing the payment of payroll services, the Court of Appeals maintained the corporate veil of the LLC in favor of its owner.

In this case, Milk never prepared a written operating agreement, and Total Pay argued that the Milk should be personally liable because he did not have a written operating agreement. The Court, however, reinforced its longstanding corporate law principle and applied it to LLCs, stating that Georgia officers and shareholders are not personally liable for corporate acts until such time that the corporate veil has been successfully pierced. The Court also found that the filing of the Articles of Organization with the Secretary of State were conclusive proof that all conditions of the formation of the LLC had been satisfied. There was no requirement for an operating agreement to be typed up and therefore, the lack of an operating agreement was not a proper basis to pierce the corporate veil.