Atlanta Business Attorney Blog

Now that the basic litigation terms have been defined, how does the process actually work in the business litigation context? One of the most commonly litigated issues is breach of contract. Here is an example of how the process would unfold.

First, the parties must enter into a contract.

Johnny and Penny have three small children and recently realized that they have outgrown their current residence. In order to purchase a larger home, they would first need to sell their current house. Unfortunately, in the current housing climate, they fear their house would sell for less than it is worth so they decide to finish their basement instead of purchasing a new home.

Johnny and Penny start interviewing contractors for the job. A+ Home Solutions puts in a bid, or an offer, to do the job for $30,000.00. Johnny and Penny submit a counteroffer, asking that A+ Home Solutions do the work for $25,000.00. The $25,000.00 counteroffer acts as a rejection of A+ Home Solutions’ initial offer. A+ Home Solutions accepts Johnny and Penny’s offer. Johnny and Penny wisely consult with their attorney who drafts a written contract for the project outlining each party’s responsibilities and duties. All of the parties sign the contract. In consideration for agreeing to finish the basement, Johnny and Penny gave A+ Home Solutions $5,000.00 to begin the work.

Continue reading "Georgia Business Litigation Terms - Example of use of terms" »

Georgia Business Litigation: Definitions of Common Terms associated with Business Law and Litigation:

Affidavit: Written testimony under oath - usually sworn to in front of a notary.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR): Methods of resolving legal disputes without going to trial, in a less adversarial manner, such as through arbitration or mediation.

Appearance: Coming into court as a party to a case or voluntarily submitting to the power of a court. Usually this is not a physical act, but a lawyer filing a document.

Arbitration: Submitting a disputed matter for decision to a person who is not a judge. The decision of an arbitrator is usually binding and final.

Arrearage: The amount of money that is past due.

Attorney (at Law): An advocate or counsel employed to prepare, manage and try cases in court. Must be licensed by the state. Lawyer and attorney are usually synonymous.

Damages: Compensation sought by the party filing a lawsuit and awarded by the court for the loss or injury allegedly suffered.

Decree: The court's written order or decision.

Default: Failing to answer a petition or complaint. Failing to file an answer or appear in court as required can result in the court awarding everything requested by the filing party.

Deposition: Part of the discovery or information-exchanging process of a legal proceeding, in which the attorney for the other party asks you questions, you answer with your attorney present, and a transcript of the proceedings is prepared.

Continue reading "Georgia Business Litigation & Law Terms - Part 2: General Legal Terminology Used In Litigation" »

Georgia Business Litigation: Definitions of Common Terms associated with Business Law and Litigation:

Affirmative Defenses: The defendants defenses to the allegations in the complaint included in the defendant’s Answer filed with the court.

Answer: A document used to respond to the complaint or petition. Answers usually admit or deny specific allegations or claims in the document being answered. Also called a response.

Appeal: A procedure to ask a higher court to review the ruling of a lower court.

Cause of Action: Failure to perform a legal obligation to do, or refrain from doing, some act that gives rise to liability for which a plaintiff seeks a legal remedy. Also called a claim.

Complaint: The document filed by the plaintiff that initiates a lawsuit. The complaint provides information regarding what harm the plaintiff is alleging and what relief the plaintiff is seeking.

Counterclaim: The claim asserted by the defendant against the plaintiff after the plaintiff files the initial lawsuit, or complaint, against the defendant. The counterclaim is asserted in the same lawsuit and is often filed with the defendant’s answer to the complaint.

Cross-Claim: In a lawsuit where there are multiple defendants, a claim or cause of action filed by one defendant against another defendant.

Continue reading "Georgia Business Litigation & Law - Part I: Pleadings & Related Litigation Terms" »

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently upheld a trial court ruling in the case of Wilks v. Overall Constr. Inc. that the 6 year statute of limitations from O.C.G.A. §9-3-24 applies for lawsuits to be filed in simple construction contract cases. This case makes two extremely important points: (1) people must abide by the time limits contained in the Official Code of Georgia if they want to ensure that their disputes will be heard; and (2) if you suspect something was constructed incorrectly, do NOT wait until you notice problems to have it inspected.

In this case, a homeowner hired a contractor to perform some construction on his home. This work was governed by a written contract signed by the parties. The work was completed on or about July 23, 1999, at which time the homeowner paid the contractor. Within a year, the homeowner began noticing problems, and over the course of the next 5 years, the contractor returned to perform repair work. Even after all of the repairs, the homeowner still noticed construction problems, and finally hired an engineer to inspect the construction in June 2007. The inspection revealed that there were deficiencies in the construction and the materials used, which prompted the homeowner to file suit in July 2007 for breach of contract – almost 8 years after the work was initially completed! Unfortunately for the home owner, he had waited too long to bring suit under the applicable statute of limitations, which resulted in dismissal of his lawsuit.

The important lesson to take from this case is that if you file suit for breach of a simple construction contract, you MUST make sure to do so within 6 years after work was substantially completed. Do NOT simply allow a contractor to make repairs, as the statute of limitations will not be adjusted to run from the most recent repair date. If only the homeowner in the Wilks case had ordered the inspection earlier, he could have filed suit prior to July 2005, thus ensuring that his case was heard.

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently upheld a trial court ruling in the case of Wilks v. Overall Constr. Inc. that the 6 year statute of limitations from O.C.G.A. §9-3-24 applies for lawsuits to be filed in simple construction contract cases. This case makes two extremely important points: (1) people must abide by the time limits contained in the Official Code of Georgia if they want to ensure that their disputes will be heard; and (2) if you suspect something was constructed incorrectly, do NOT wait until you notice problems to have it inspected.

In this case, a homeowner hired a contractor to perform some construction on his home. This work was governed by a written contract signed by the parties. The work was completed on or about July 23, 1999, at which time the homeowner paid the contractor. Within a year, the homeowner began noticing problems, and over the course of the next 5 years, the contractor returned to perform repair work. Even after all of the repairs, the homeowner still noticed construction problems, and finally hired an engineer to inspect the construction in June 2007. The inspection revealed that there were deficiencies in the construction and the materials used, which prompted the homeowner to file suit in July 2007 for breach of contract – almost 8 years after the work was initially completed! Unfortunately for the home owner, he had waited too long to bring suit under the applicable statute of limitations, which resulted in dismissal of his lawsuit.

The important lesson to take from this case is that if you file suit for breach of a simple construction contract, you MUST make sure to do so within 6 years after work was substantially completed. Do NOT simply allow a contractor to make repairs, as the statute of limitations will not be adjusted to run from the most recent repair date. If only the homeowner in the Wilks case had ordered the inspection earlier, he could have filed suit prior to July 2005, thus ensuring that his case was heard.